What 20 percent equity to a technical cofounder actually costs at Series A compared with a fractional CTO or subscription dev team over the same 18 months.

SUMMARY

A 20 percent technical co-founder grant can be worth roughly $2M to $5M at an 18-month Series A. The same period bought with a fractional CTO or subscription dev team runs about $144K to $270K or $180K to $240K in cash.

Equity is the most expensive capital a founder issues. Use it when the technical partner is the reason the company exists, not when the real need is senior product shipping capacity.

Below the surface

I

I have watched a dozen founders do the math wrong on this one. The reflex is "I need a technical co-founder." The default ask is 20 percent equity at idea stage. The spreadsheet rarely gets opened before the term sheet gets signed.

At a $60M post-money Series A, a 20 percent pre-A grant that dilutes to 16 percent is worth $9.6M on paper. Even using the more conservative Series A range in the draft, that same grant represents roughly $2M to $5M of founder value for an 18-month build.

Treasure-map style 18-month cost map comparing technical co-founder equity at 2 to 5 million dollars with fractional CTO cost of 144 to 270 thousand dollars and dev team cost of 180 to 240 thousand dollars.
18-month cost map. Equity looks free until the Series A cap table prices it.
Indexed transcript of the 18-month cost map. Technical co-founder: 20 percent grant, worth roughly $2M to $5M at an 18-month Series A, with no or low cash outlay. Fractional CTO: $144K to $270K across 18 months, zero equity transferred. Subscription dev team: $180K to $240K across 18 months, zero equity transferred. Cash options preserve roughly $1.7M to $4.7M of company value at Series A.

By the numbers

The equity math that changes the answer

  • Default ask

    20%

    Common idea-stage technical co-founder equity grant.

  • Series A value

    $2M-$5M

    Approximate 18-month value of the equity path in the draft's conservative Series A range.

  • Fractional CTO

    $144K-$270K

    Cash cost for a real working fractional CTO engagement over 18 months.

  • Dev team

    $180K-$240K

    Cash cost for a subscription dev team across the same 18-month window.

03 / What cash buys

The same 18 months bought in cash

The real comparison is not equity versus nothing. It is equity versus the cash options that buy senior judgment and shipping output without transferring ownership.

01

Technical co-founder

A 20 percent grant can cost $2M to $5M in Series A terms, even when the cash outlay during the build is low.

02

Fractional CTO

$8K to $15K monthly buys architecture, technical leadership, build-vs-buy decisions, hiring support, and fundraising support.

03

Subscription dev team

$10K to $13K monthly buys a product-ownership-level pod that ships features without equity or hiring overhead.

04 / Cash objection

Where the "I cannot afford cash" argument breaks

If the only reason to choose a co-founder is that cash feels scarce, price the future equity before you call it cheap.

  1. 01

    A pre-seed can be cheaper

    A $750K pre-seed at a $4M pre-money valuation is roughly 16 percent dilution, and it can fund the 18 months without giving a single builder 20 percent.

  2. 02

    Equity is de-risking capital

    When a founder has only a slide, the technical co-founder is being asked to de-risk the idea. The market price for that risk is high.

  3. 03

    No runway is a constraint

    If you literally cannot pay anyone, equity may be the only option. That does not make it inexpensive.

  4. 04

    Alignment still needs structure

    Even when equity is right, use a 4-year vest and 1-year cliff so the cap table reflects durable contribution.

05 / Equity path

When the equity path is still the right call

Equity is not wrong. It is just too expensive to use for ordinary execution work.

Treasure-map style equity decision map showing rare technical insight, no runway, no priced round, partner not builder, and cash path routes.
Equity decision map. Use ownership for rare insight and true partnership, not for generic shipping capacity.
Indexed transcript of the equity decision map. Equity can be right when the technical co-founder is the reason the company exists, when there is no cash runway, when the company will not raise a priced round and equity behaves more like profit share, or when the founder wants a true partner rather than a builder. Most shipping-only cases should use the cash path: fractional CTO plus subscription dev team.

06 / Hybrid path

The hybrid path working in 2026

Most founders are not trying to recruit irreplaceable technical insight. They need someone to ship the MVP and keep the architecture sane.

  1. 01

    Fractional CTO for strategy

    $5K to $10K per month buys 8 to 15 hours of senior technical leadership. Use it for architecture, build-vs-buy calls, early hiring, and fundraising support.

  2. 02

    Subscription dev team for production

    $10K to $15K per month buys a 2-to-3 person pod that ships features. The founder keeps equity, gets parallel throughput, and can terminate with a clear handoff.

  3. 03

    The 18-month range is still lower

    $270K to $450K is expensive relative to bootstrap. It is still a fraction of a 20 percent equity grant priced at Series A.

  4. 04

    Transition after the raise

    Post-Series A, a full-time CTO becomes cheaper. That is when 0.5 to 2 percent plus salary can replace the fractional-to-pod setup.

Field F.A.Q.

FAQ

How much equity should I give a technical co-founder?

If they are the reason the company exists, 30 to 50 percent can be appropriate. If they are a builder you met on an engineering Slack, 10 to 20 percent with a 4-year vest and 1-year cliff is more honest. If the work can be bought with cash, the answer is often zero.

What is a fractional CTO actually worth per month?

$8K to $15K for a real working engagement at 30 to 60 engaged hours, or $5K to $8K for pure advisory work at 10 to 20 hours.

Can a subscription dev team replace a technical co-founder?

Most of the output, yes. The psychological partnership, no. Price that relationship honestly instead of pretending equity is only paying for code.

How do I know if equity is still right?

Ask whether this person could be replaced at any cash rate. If yes, it is probably execution work. If no because they carry irreplaceable domain insight, equity is the right tool.

What if I already gave away too much equity?

Structure a reasonable vesting schedule if one does not exist, then have a lawyer-mediated conversation about exit terms if the co-founder is not carrying their weight. Do not try to claw back vested equity without counsel.